Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Section 25F – Merely because the appointments are not in accordance with the procedure would not disentitle them from claiming protection under provisions of the Act 1947.
Case Law Reference
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority v. Karamjit Singh, (2019) 16 SCC 782
- Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam v. Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh, (2019) 14 SCC 449
- District Development Officer v. Satish Kantilal Amralia, (2018) 12 SCC 298
- Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Bhurumal, (2014) 7 SCC 177
- Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. v. Intejam Ali Zafri, (2006) 6 SCC 275
- Nagar Mahapalika v. State of U.P., (2006) 5 SCC 127
- R. Vishwanatha Pillai v. State of Kerala, (2004) 2 SCC 105
- Punjab Land Development and Reclamation Corporation Ltd. v. Labour Court, (1990) 3 SCC 682
- L. Robert D’Souza v. Southern Railway, (1982) 1 SCC 645
- State Bank of India v. N. Sundara Money, (1976) 1 SCC 822